tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post8459721438823338793..comments2024-10-25T13:58:36.797+01:00septicislehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03369157723084834549noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-75713722292809864962015-12-09T10:39:32.515+00:002015-12-09T10:39:32.515+00:00And I&#39;m not defending the legal definition of terrorism - it&#39;s far too broad. But, even so, it won&#39;t stretch this far.Philhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07009879034507926661noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14422435.post-51805061016983330982015-12-09T10:38:13.929+00:002015-12-09T10:38:13.929+00:00The (legal) definition of terrorism is committing <b>or</b> threatening violence, for a political cause, <i>with the aim of intimidating the public or influencing the government</i> - and there&#39;s no evidence of the third element here. Attacking one person and threatening another doesn&#39;t add up to violence plus intimidation - just actual violence and threatened violence.Philhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07009879034507926661noreply@blogger.com